NuvMed

Medico-legal records review

Hours of records review,
done in minutes.

NuvMed reads a full medical records bundle, extracts every clinical event, and builds the cited chronology a medico-legal report needs — pre-accident and post-accident, with the inconsistencies flagged.

Prepares the expert’s work product. It does not give an opinion — under CPR Part 35 that duty stays with the expert.

1,769 → 129records narrowed to a reviewable chronology on a 120-page export
100%recall against the human-reviewed entries on native-text records
Every line citedback to the document and page it was read from

How it works

01

Upload the bundle

GP, hospital and physiotherapy records, the expert's report, and the instruction letter. PDF, Word or scans.

02

Identity is checked

Claimant name and date of birth are verified against the documents before anything is processed. Mismatches are flagged, not assumed.

03

The record is read

Every page routed and read — including scanned letters buried inside an otherwise digital export. Nothing is skipped silently.

04

You review and export

A cited chronology, split pre- and post-accident, with flags for the things that matter. Edit inline, then export to Word.

Scanned pages are the trap

A GP export can report a text layer on every single page while most of those pages carry their clinical content inside an embedded scan — behind nothing but a stamp.

iGPR Report
Page 40 of 116
Blacketts Medical Practice, DL3 7JR
THIRD PARTY COPY

Software that trusts a non-empty text layer reads that page as done, drops the letter inside it, and still produces something clean and confident. In one bundle we tested, 79 of 116 pages were affected.

NuvMed asks whether the text accounts for the ink on the page. Anything it cannot read confidently is put in front of you — never dropped quietly.

Built to be checked

  • Every entry cites its source page. One click opens the original scan beside the extracted text.
  • Dates are parsed, not guessed. Day-first and month-first conventions are inferred per document; anything ambiguous is flagged rather than resolved silently.
  • You edit everything. Rewrite a line, exclude an entry, dismiss a flag. The export follows your edits, in your house format.
  • UK-hosted, on your infrastructure. No third-party model endpoint. Records do not leave the system.
  • Append-only audit trail of who viewed and changed what.

What it flags

Each flag names the records behind it, so you can open the page and judge for yourself. They are observations about what the records show — never conclusions.

Prior accidents

Earlier RTAs and trauma in the records, before the index accident.

Pre-existing symptoms

The same body region symptomatic beforehand — the apportionment question.

Subsequent accidents

A further accident afterwards, which may break the chain of causation.

Prognosis contradicted

The report says resolved in six months; the records show entries after that.

Late onset

A pleaded injury first appearing well after the accident date.

Unpleaded injuries

A new region appearing post-accident that nobody claimed.

Ready to review a case?

Sign in to upload a bundle and build a chronology.